鈥淚t was the worst! The worst-tasting urine I鈥檝e ever tasted in my entire life. You could bottle thisstuff and sell it to bring people back from the dead. I know you can drink urine, but not if it鈥檚 beenheated and shaken in your kidneys for forty miles. It was a failed experiment. I wouldn鈥檛 drink thaturine if it was the last liquid on planet Earth.鈥? They ran way too hard: 鈥淭he modus operandi was to let a bunch of competitive guys have at eachother every day in a form of road rage,鈥?one observer put it. And they were waaay too buddy-buddy for so-called competitors: 鈥淲e liked running together,鈥?recalled Bill Rodgers, a chieftain ofthe 鈥?0s tribe and four-time Boston Marathon champ. 鈥淲e had fun with it. It wasn鈥檛 a grind.鈥? 鈥楢nd the bedside where you had been before?鈥?asked Alice. Zatopek鈥檚 inexperience quickly became obvious. It was a hot day, so England鈥檚 Jim Peters, thenthe world-record holder, decided to use the heat to make Zatopek suffer. By the ten-mile mark,Peters was already ten minutes under his own world-record pace and pulling away from the field. In this summary of my outward life I have now arrived at the period at which my tranquil and retired existence as a writer of books was to be exchanged for the less congenial occupation of a member of the House of Commons. The proposal made to me, early in 1865, by some electors of Westminster, did not present the idea to me for the first time. It was not even the first offer I had received, for, more than ten years previous, in consequence of my opinions on the irish Land question, Mr Lucas and Mr Duffy, in the name of the popular party in Ireland, offered to bring me into Parliament for an Irish County, which they could easily have done: but the incompatibility of a seat in Parliament with the office I then held in the India House, precluded even consideration of the proposal. After I had quitted the India House, several of my friends would gladly have seen me a member of Parliament; but there seemed no probability that the idea would ever take any practical shape. I was convinced that no numerous or influential portion of any electoral body, really wished to be represented by a person of my opinions; and that one who possessed no local connexion or popularity, and who did not choose to stand as the mere organ of a party had small chance of being elected anywhere unless through the expenditure of money. Now it was, and is, my fixed conviction, that a candidate ought not to incur one farthing of expense for undertaking a public duty. Such of the lawful expenses of an election as have no special reference to any particular candidate, ought to be borne as a public charge, either by the State or by the locality. What has to be done by the supporters of each candidate in order to bring his claims properly before the constituency, should be done by unpaid agency or by voluntary subscription. If members of the electoral body, or others, are willing to subscribe money of their own for the purpose of bringing, by lawful means, into Parliament some one who they think would be useful there, no one is entitled to object: but that the expense, or any part of it, should fall on the candidate, is fundamentally wrong; because it amounts in reality to buying his seat. Even on the most favourable supposition as to the mode in which the money is expended, there is a legitimate suspicion that any one who gives money for leave to undertake a public trust, has other than public ends to promote by it; and (a consideration of the greatest importance) the cost of elections, when borne by the candidates, deprives the nation of the services, as members of Parliament, of all who cannot or will not afford to incur a heavy expense. I do not say that, so long as there is scarcely a chance for an independent candidate to come into Parliament without complying with this vicious practice, it must always be morally wrong in him to spend money, provided that no part of it is either directly or indirectly employed in corruption. But, to justify it, he ought to be very certain that he can be of more use to his country as a member of Parliament than in any other mode which is open to him; and this assurance, in my own case, I did not feel. It was by no means clear to me that I could do more to advance the public objects which had a claim on my exertions, from the benches of the House of Commons, than from the simple position of a writer. I felt, therefore, that I ought not to seek election to Parliament, much less to expend any money in procuring it. 2019最新国产不卡a,香蕉影视在线观看免费,国产精品高清视频,亚洲 中文 自拍 另类 精品 This is at the very foundation of rapport by design. Would I not like to be like Apelles? Soon after this time I took from their repository a portion of the unpublished papers which I had written during the last years of our married life, and shaped them, with some additional matter, into the little work entitled "Utilitarianism"; which was first published, in three parts, in successive numbers of Fraser's Magazine, and afterwards reprinted in a volume.